Politics11 views5 min read

Liverpool's Parking Fee U-Turn: Surprise 'Free Hours' Plan

In a major U-turn, Liverpool City Council is considering a new plan for park parking, offering three hours free in a bid to target commuters, not families.

Liam Dempsey
By
Liam Dempsey

Liam Dempsey is the Local Politics and Civic Affairs Correspondent for Liverpool News Today. He provides in-depth analysis of Liverpool City Council decisions, urban development, and community issues affecting the region.

Author Profile
Liverpool's Parking Fee U-Turn: Surprise 'Free Hours' Plan

Liverpool residents who fiercely campaigned against controversial new parking charges in the city's beloved green spaces may have just received an 'unexpected gift'. In a significant policy shift, Liverpool City Council is now considering a completely different approach that could see most park visitors avoid paying anything at all.

The new proposal, a stark departure from the original flat-rate fee plan, introduces a high-tech solution aimed at commuters rather than families and dog walkers. This surprising development follows months of public pressure and could reshape how parking is managed across 16 key parks and open spaces.

Key Takeaways

  • Liverpool City Council is dropping its initial plan for flat-rate parking charges in 16 city parks.
  • A new proposal suggests using ANPR cameras to offer the first three hours of parking for free.
  • Charges would only apply to vehicles staying longer than three hours, targeting all-day commuter parking.
  • The move follows significant public backlash against the original proposal, which aimed to raise £350,000 annually.
  • The revised plan will be presented to the council's cabinet for consideration next week.

The Original Plan and Public Outcry

The saga began when Liverpool City Council, as part of its 2023/24 budget, announced plans to introduce parking fees across a wide array of the city's most popular parks. The list included iconic locations such as Sefton Park, Calderstones Park, and Everton Park, impacting thousands of daily visitors.

The objective was clear: to generate an estimated £350,000 in annual revenue to help bridge the council's significant budget gap. However, the proposal was met with immediate and widespread opposition from residents, community groups, and local politicians who argued it would penalize families, the elderly, and those with lower incomes, effectively creating a barrier to accessing vital public green spaces.

Background: A Controversial Budget Decision

The initial decision to charge for parking was one of several difficult measures included in the council's budget to address financial pressures. The plan involved installing payment machines and enforcing charges across 16 different sites, a move that critics labeled a 'tax on nature' that would disproportionately affect regular park users.

A Surprising Turnaround: The 'Unexpected Gift'

In a dramatic policy pivot, the council is now set to review an alternative that has been hailed as a major victory for campaigners. The new system would leverage Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) technology to monitor vehicles entering and exiting park car parks.

Under this revised scheme, parking would remain completely free for the first three hours. A fee would only be triggered for vehicles that overstay this generous grace period. This fundamental change shifts the focus from a blanket revenue-raising measure to a strategic tool for traffic management.

"It is an unexpected gift... I am absolutely delighted on behalf of the residents of Liverpool," stated Cllr Alan Tormey, leader of the Liverpool Community Independents group, who had been a vocal opponent of the original charges.

Cllr Tormey acknowledged the council's financial challenges but praised the new proposal as a far more equitable solution. He noted that the original plan was "always a bad idea" and that this new approach represents a sensible compromise.

Targeting Commuters, Protecting Park Users

A Strategic Shift in Policy

The primary rationale behind the ANPR proposal is to tackle the long-standing issue of commuter parking. Many park car parks, particularly those near major transport routes or commercial areas, are frequently used by commuters for free all-day parking, occupying spaces meant for genuine park visitors.

By implementing a three-hour free limit, the council aims to deter this practice while ensuring that the vast majority of people using the parks for leisure, exercise, or family outings are not financially penalized. A three-hour window is considered ample time for most typical park activities, from a long walk to a family picnic or a visit to a playground.

By the Numbers: The Impact

  • 16: The number of parks and green spaces initially slated for parking charges.
  • 3 hours: The proposed free parking period under the new ANPR system.
  • £350,000: The annual revenue the council originally hoped to raise from the flat-rate fees.

How Would the ANPR System Work?

The proposed system is designed for simplicity and efficiency:

  1. ANPR cameras would be installed at the entrance and exit of designated car parks.
  2. The cameras would automatically log a vehicle's entry and exit time.
  3. No action, such as buying a ticket, would be required for stays under three hours.
  4. For stays exceeding three hours, drivers would need to pay the required tariff, likely via a mobile app or on-site payment point.

This automated approach removes the need for traditional pay-and-display machines for short stays and focuses enforcement on long-stay vehicles.

What Happens Next?

While this new proposal is a significant step, it is not yet a final decision. The revised plan is scheduled to be presented to Liverpool City Council's cabinet for detailed discussion next week. If the cabinet approves the principle, the proposal will likely move forward to a formal public consultation phase.

This consultation will be crucial in gathering public feedback on the specifics of the ANPR system, including the exact charging structure for stays over three hours and the full list of parks where it would be implemented.

For the thousands of residents who signed petitions and voiced their opposition, this development is a promising sign that the council has listened to their concerns. The focus now shifts from protest to participation, as the city awaits the final details of a plan that could preserve free access to its cherished parks for generations to come.